Is human activity responsible for global climate change? What can be done to mitigate the problem?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Global climate change has become a defining challenge of the modern era, raising debate about its causes and appropriate responses. The evidence strongly indicates that human activity is the primary driver of recent warming trends, rather than natural cycles alone. Consequently, effective mitigation clearly depends on deliberate changes in economic behaviour, energy use, and governance.
First, industrialisation has increased greenhouse gas emissions through fossil fuel combustion, deforestation, and intensive agriculture, which trap heat in the atmosphere. This process therefore explains rising global temperatures, melting ice, and more frequent extreme weather events. For example, rapid urban growth and car dependence have sharply increased carbon emissions in many countries, thus amplifying long-term climatic instability. Indeed, research demonstrates this trend across regions.
Second, to mitigate this problem, societies must generally prioritise emission reduction through renewable energy, efficiency improvements, and sustainable transport. Moreover, governments play a crucial role via regulation of pollution, carbon pricing, and investment in low carbon infrastructure. In addition, individuals can contribute through reduced energy consumption and support for environmentally responsible products, thereby creating cumulative impacts that reinforce policy action.
Overall, human influence on climate change is undoubtedly clear, substantial, and ongoing. Furthermore, addressing it requires aligned mitigation strategies that align technological innovation with behavioural change. Therefore, if decisive action is taken now, the most severe environmental, economic, and social consequences of climate change can certainly still be limited.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.