The role of a library in keeping books is obsolete. So universities should use digital media. What is your opinion? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
University libraries have traditionally preserved printed books as the core academic resource, yet rapid digital transformation challenges this function. I partly agree that dependence on physical collections is becoming outdated, and universities should prioritise digital media, although libraries still retain limited but important roles beyond simple storage.
Digital media offers clear advantages for higher education. Electronic journals and e-books provide immediate access to extensive and current materials regardless of location, which supports flexible learning and research efficiency. For instance, students can search academic databases instantly rather than rely on scarce printed copies. Digital resources also reduce costs related to space, printing, and maintenance, enabling universities to redirect funding towards teaching quality and educational innovation.
However, replacing libraries entirely with digital platforms has notable disadvantages. Not all academic texts have been converted into digital formats, and licensing arrangements can restrict long-term availability. Furthermore, prolonged screen use may hinder deep reading and sustained concentration, while technical failures or limited internet access can interrupt study. Libraries also operate as quiet study environments and centres for academic guidance, functions that purely online systems cannot adequately replicate.
In conclusion, digital media should become the primary medium in universities because of its accessibility, efficiency, and scalability. Nevertheless, describing the library as obsolete is an overstatement. A balanced approach, in which digital resources dominate while libraries evolve into learning and support spaces, best serves contemporary higher education.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.