Textbooks should be replaced by online resources and advanced technology? How far do you agree?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
The rapid expansion of digital platforms has transformed how knowledge is produced and accessed, raising questions about the future role of printed textbooks in education. I largely agree that online resources and advanced technology should replace textbooks in most contexts, although limited retention of print materials remains justified for specific purposes.
The strongest argument for replacement is that digital resources offer unparalleled accessibility, flexibility, and currency of information. Online materials can be updated instantly, incorporate multimedia explanations, and support adaptive learning tools, which printed textbooks cannot provide. For example, interactive simulations in science subjects allow students to visualise abstract concepts, improving comprehension and engagement while reducing long-term costs for institutions.
However, complete elimination of textbooks is neither practical nor educationally sound. Printed texts encourage sustained reading, reduce screen fatigue, and remain reliable in environments with limited connectivity. In disciplines such as law or literature, carefully curated textbooks provide stable reference points, suggesting that technology should complement rather than entirely displace traditional materials.
In conclusion, advanced technology and online resources should become the primary educational tools because of their adaptability and reach. Nevertheless, a selective use of textbooks remains valuable where deep reading and reliability are essential. A balanced transition, rather than absolute replacement, best serves diverse learning needs.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.