Some people think traditional cultures should be strictly followed, while others think modern people should adopt a new way of life. What is your opinion?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
A debate persists over whether societies should strictly preserve traditional cultures or embrace modern ways of living. While tradition provides identity and continuity, I believe modern people should adapt new practises selectively, integrating them with inherited values rather than following customs rigidly.
Rigid adherence to tradition can restrict social progress and individual opportunity. Norms formed in agrarian or patriarchal contexts may conflict with contemporary realities such as urbanisation, gender equality, and a knowledge economy. For example, unquestioned obedience to elders or fixed career expectations can limit educational choices and innovation. Adopting modern lifestyles enables people to respond effectively to technological change and global interaction, thereby improving productivity and personal freedom.
Admittedly, abandoning tradition entirely risks cultural erosion and social fragmentation. Customs, languages, and rituals transmit ethical frameworks and a sense of communal belonging that modern life often lacks. However, preservation is most effective when traditions are allowed to evolve. Festivals can be maintained through modern organisation, and moral principles such as respect and responsibility can guide behaviour without enforcing outdated rules. This adaptive approach safeguards cultural heritage while remaining socially relevant.
In conclusion, tradition should inform rather than imprison contemporary life. By selectively adopting modern ways while retaining core cultural values, societies can achieve continuity alongside progress. Such a balanced approach allows cultures to remain meaningful, resilient, and capable of meeting present and future challenges.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.