Mass media, including TV and newspaper, have a great influence on humans, particularly on the younger generation. It can shape people's opinions. What is your opinion?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Contemporary mass media, notably television and newspapers, exert great influence over public thinking, with younger audiences being especially susceptible. I strongly agree that these channels shape human opinions because they frame information repeatedly and authoritatively. While media can inform and educate, its persuasive power often directs attitudes before critical thinking is fully developed, particularly during formative years.
Firstly, constant exposure to television and newspaper content normalises particular viewpoints and priorities among the youth. News selection, headlines, and visual framing guide attention towards some topics while pushing others aside. For teenagers who rely on media to understand society, repeated narratives about success, beauty, or risk quietly establish values that later feel like personal beliefs. This effect is amplified by advertising and emotive storytelling, which associate ideas with admired public figures and strong feelings, strengthening media's influence over each new generation.
However, some argue that individuals choose media selectively and are not passive recipients. This is partly true, but young people often lack the media literacy required to recognise bias, commercial incentives, and ideological manipulation. Moreover, competitive news cycles and sensational programmes intensify influence by prioritising engagement over accuracy. Consequently, simplified or extreme opinions based on distorted information can spread rapidly and appear socially acceptable.
In conclusion, mass media powerfully shapes human opinions, particularly among the young, through repetition, framing, and emotional appeal. Strengthening media awareness alongside responsible regulation of news content is therefore essential to balance influence with informed and independent judgement.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.