Tourism is good for a less developed country, but the disadvantages of tourism can be as great as the advantages. Discuss it.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Tourism is frequently promoted as a development strategy for less developed countries because it generates revenue and global visibility. Nevertheless, although the benefits are considerable, the disadvantages can be just as serious. This essay contends that tourism provides economic opportunities while simultaneously creating significant risks.
One major advantage of tourism is its ability to create employment and earn foreign currency. Tourist spending supports accommodation, transport, food services, and local handicrafts, thereby increasing incomes and reducing joblessness. Moreover, tourism can encourage investment in infrastructure such as roads and airports, which may improve living standards and stimulate other sectors of the economy.
Despite these gains, tourism also brings substantial drawbacks. Financial returns are often uneven, as profits may flow to overseas corporations instead of local communities. Excessive reliance on tourism can further expose economies to external shocks, including economic downturns or travel bans. Additionally, large-scale tourism frequently leads to environmental damage, such as pollution and habitat loss, and cultural practises may be commodified to meet visitor expectations.
In summary, tourism can assist development in poorer nations; yet its disadvantages can rival its advantages when growth is poorly regulated. To maximise benefits, governments must prioritise sustainable planning, protect the environment, and ensure meaningful local participation so that tourism supports long-term development rather than dependency.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.