Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
CELPIP Practice Reading: Reading for Viewpoints ID: #63214 Medium Two Languages at Every Counter

Read the following editorial from a website.

A caller who needs help in French should not wait longer than one who speaks English, and a patient at a hospital intake desk should be understood in whichever official language she uses. We believe the province is right to widen its bilingual service rules for front counters, city service lines and emergency intake. We also believe the plan now before the legislature moves faster than hiring can follow, and that it leans too hard on the clerks who already carry the load.

Adele Bernier, a language-rights lawyer, says service that depends on the luck of the roster is not a real guarantee. She showed legislators call-centre logs in which French callers wait on hold far longer at triage lines, and she wants a map of designated posts with bilingual hours listed for each one. Bernier also asks for paid training and a pay premium, so that bilingual work stops being unpaid overtime. Ewan Maheu, who runs hiring for a city of about 90,000, warns that designating hundreds of posts at once would leave desks empty in towns where few applicants can pass a fluency test. He supports the goal, but he would phase designations in as training programs graduate people and would borrow staff from nearby towns that already run bilingual teams.

Galina Pratt, who speaks for front-line workers in their union at a provincial service centre, says bilingual employees are already pulled away to translate for entire departments with no break. She will back Bernier’s premium only if schedules set aside protected blocks of time for language work, instead of grabbing whoever speaks both languages. Kemal Klassen, who guides patients through a regional hospital, notes that intake mistakes climb whenever interpreters are booked at the last minute. He wants bilingual staff on every triage shift, with video interpretation only as a backup, and he agrees with Maheu on phasing as long as emergency desks publish bilingual hours within the first year.

In our view, the province should adopt the map Bernier wants, but on Maheu’s timetable, with emergency desks first, as Klassen asks. We also think the premium should come with Pratt’s protected blocks, or it will simply pay people more to be interrupted. And the legislature must fund training seats now, because a phased plan with no graduates is only a delay with a nicer name. We would rather see our province promise a little less and deliver all of it than announce a map it cannot staff.

Using the drop-down menu (▾), choose the best option according to the information given on the website.

This editorial is mainly about 1.
.

Who most clearly fears that a fast rollout could leave some counters without staff? 2.
.

Adele Bernier’s position would most likely be supported by 3.
.

What outcome does Galina Pratt’s condition call for? 4.
.

The editorial’s attitude toward the plan before the legislature is best described as 5.
.

The following is a comment by a visitor to the website page. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

Twice this year my aunt sat in an emergency waiting room in Moncton trying to describe her pain in English, a language she handles well only when she is calm. That is why the lawyer’s call for 6.
made sense to me at once. She also wants a premium so that the extra effort 7.
, and nobody I know would argue with that. The union steward says bilingual staff are pulled away to 8.
, which sounds exhausting for everyone involved. The patient navigator worries about mistakes when 9.
, and my aunt’s story shows he has reason to. Most of all, the province should 10.
, or the whole plan will stall.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet — submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...