Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
CELPIP Practice Reading: Reading for Viewpoints ID: #63213 Medium The Map Should Speak the Language

Read the following editorial from a website.

Drive north of our city and you pass lakes, rivers and highway exits whose names were chosen by surveyors more than a century ago, often on top of names the local First Nation had used for far longer. Our province now plans to restore many of the original names on road signs, maps and transit announcements. We fully support that goal. The real questions are how quickly the change happens, who pays for it and who decides how each name is spelled, and on those we believe a careful plan will serve everyone better than a rushed one.

Manon Archambault, who leads the Nation’s language program, argues that the original names should become the main names on signs within five years. “Children learn their place in the world from the names around them,” she said at a provincial hearing, citing a school survey in which few students could name a single local place in the language. She also wants a recording of how each name sounds built into transit apps from the first day. Valentin Kucera, the region’s director of public works, supports the change but warns that replacing every sign in one summer would empty the winter road budget. He proposes a staged plan that starts with highways and emergency routes, plus a public record of the costs.

Clarisse Ellery, who runs a canoe outfitter, says visitors still follow older guidebooks and phone maps, and she worries they will miss turnoffs while the signs are changing. She backs Archambault’s goal if both the new and old names appear at major exits for the first few years and online map services receive the new names before the summer season. Severin Beaudry, an Elder who advises the Nation’s council, says the community itself must decide how names are written. He has seen souvenir shops print spellings that no speaker would recognize, and he wants a list approved by the Nation to be the only source for public signs.

We side with Archambault that the original names should lead, and with Beaudry that the community must hold the pen. Kucera’s staged plan is the sensible way to get there, and Ellery’s shared signs at major exits are a small price for safety. The province should adopt a five-year schedule that begins with highways and emergency routes, use only the Nation’s approved spellings, fund temporary signs with both names where drivers need them, and publish the costs as the work goes. Done this way, we believe the change can be respectful and orderly.

Using the drop-down menu (▾), choose the best option according to the information given on the website.

This editorial is mainly about 1.
.

Who most clearly worries that visitors could get lost during the change? 2.
.

Manon Archambault’s position would most likely be supported by 3.
.

What outcome does Valentin Kucera’s plan call for? 4.
.

Why does the editorial mention the surveyors in its first paragraph? 5.
.

The following is a comment by a visitor to the website page. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

I have driven a delivery van on the northern highway for twelve years, and I know every exit, gas station and diner between here and the lake. Manon Archambault wants 6.
in transit apps from the first day, and I would happily have the same thing in my truck. Valentin Kucera warns that changing every sign in one summer would 7.
, and yet he still supports the change itself, which I respect. The Elder has seen 8.
print spellings that no speaker would recognize, which I did not expect. He wants 9.
to be the only source for public signs, and that seems right to me. Your recommendation to 10.
is the part of the plan I like best.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet — submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...