Positive and negative impacts on the change of means of communicating in society in the past ten years.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Over the past ten years, communication in society has changed from mainly face-to-face and email exchange to instant, platform-driven communication. These changes in the means of communication have produced clear positive and negative impacts. Consequently, the effects reach almost every relationship, and society now depends on digital connection in ways that were rare a decade ago.
On the positive side, modern communication tools have strengthened global connection and efficiency across society. For example, messaging and video communication let people sustain long-distance connection and obtain information immediately, which is a beneficial impact. Moreover, remote communication lowers travel costs and supports flexible work, so these changes bring economic effects that benefit the wider society. Such accessible communication has clearly improved connection in education, commerce and public services.
However, the same changes in communication have created negative effects on social behaviour and well-being. Continuous online communication promotes distraction and reliance on digital validation, and this impact weakens attention year after year. Furthermore, text-based communication limits empathy because non-verbal cues are absent, an effect that can damage trust and connection in personal relationships. Notably, misinformation and reduced privacy are further harmful impacts of these communication changes on society.
In summary, the changes in the means of communication during the past ten years have produced both benefits and harms for society. Although digital communication enhances connection and efficiency, it can undermine the emotional quality of human connection. Ultimately, the long-term effect depends on responsible communication that preserves meaningful connection within society.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.