Nowadays, bickering is a common trend amongst youngsters and married people. This has led to polygamy and high divorce rates. Justify the response with your positive or negative views.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Frequent bickering among young couples and married people is increasingly visible, often amplified by social pressure and communication breakdowns. Some argue that this pattern of conflict fuels polygamy and rising divorce rates among youngsters and spouses alike. I take a largely negative view of this claim, because persistent conflict reflects deeper relational failures rather than justifying alternative marital arrangements.
Among youngsters, constant bickering commonly arises from emotional immaturity, unrealistic expectations, and digital distractions between partners. For example, when disagreements are handled poorly, the conflict erodes trust between people and makes separation more likely. Indeed, youth who rely on impulsive messaging instead of calm discussion often escalate a minor dispute into lasting resentment. This dynamic contributes to break-ups, yet it demonstrates a need for better conflict management rather than validating multiple partnerships or polygamy.
In marriage, bickering can indeed precede divorce when issues such as finances, roles, or fidelity remain unresolved between spouses. However, linking such conflict to polygamy is problematic. Notably, polygamy does not solve communication failures for married people, and it often multiplies conflict by adding competition and inequality among partners. Moreover, many spouses recover when they adopt counselling and compromise, showing that divorce is not an inevitable outcome for every married couple.
In conclusion, while habitual bickering can increase instability and divorce rates, it does not justify polygamy and should not be treated as an unavoidable trend among youngsters. Therefore, strengthening the communication skills of partners and spouses offers a far more constructive response to conflict than polygamy or divorce.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.