Do you think the school should have a curriculum asking students to play old drama and work for theatre centuries ago?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Including a curriculum that asks students to study and perform drama from past centuries is worthwhile. Such an approach does not merely preserve tradition; it deepens cultural literacy and strengthens core academic skills. I believe schools should include old drama and theatre practice as a structured component of arts education.
First, historical drama exposes students to enduring themes, language, and social values that continue to shape modern societies. Performing classical plays requires close reading, interpretation, and collaboration, which develop analytical thinking and communication. For example, staging a Shakespearean scene demands attention to context, rhetoric, and character motivation, skills that transfer directly to literature and public speaking. As a result, students gain a richer understanding of history while improving academic competence.
Secondly, practical theatre work from earlier periods nurtures creativity and empathy in ways modern media often cannot. Recreating traditional stage techniques, costumes, and performance styles encourages problem-solving and teamwork under constraints. Critics argue that old drama is irrelevant to contemporary life; however, its exploration of power, morality, and identity remains highly relevant. When guided effectively, students can connect these themes to present-day issues.
In conclusion, a curriculum that includes centuries-old drama and theatre practice offers significant educational value. It strengthens cultural awareness, transferable skills, and creative engagement. Therefore, schools should adopt such programmes in a balanced and accessible manner.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.