The environment we live in is at stake due to a range of problems. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible for combatting this?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
The natural environment is increasingly under threat as economic activity and consumption intensify globally. While damage to the environment appears in many forms, the underlying causes of these problems are largely systemic rather than accidental. I argue that unsustainable production is the primary cause, and that responsibility for combating such environmental damage lies mainly with government and industries, reinforced by individual action.
A major cause of the problems is the consistent prioritisation of short-term growth over ecological limits. Fossil-fuel industries, intensive agriculture, and mass manufacturing often generate pollution, deforestation, and biodiversity loss when government regulation is weak. Consequently, consumer-oriented industries encourage excessive energy use and disposable products, and this consumption places sustained pressure on the environment.
Responsibility for combating environmental decline rests chiefly with government and large industries, as they control the laws, investment, and the majority of pollution. Effective government regulation, incentives for renewable energy, and accountable industries can reduce environmental damage at scale. Nevertheless, individuals remain responsible too, because choices about transport and consumption still influence the pollution and deforestation that industries produce.
In summary, environmental problems arise from growth-driven industries that ignore ecological limits and cause visible damage. Government and industries must lead the combating effort through regulation and innovation, while responsible citizens support these causes through better behaviour. Ultimately, only aligned action can realistically protect the environment on which long-term human wellbeing depends.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.