Do you think extreme sports like skiing, water rafting etc. are dangerous and should be prohibited/banned? or Are you in favour of these activities, why?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Extreme sports such as skiing and white-water rafting are often criticised as excessively risky, leading some to argue they should be banned. However, I am strongly in favour of these activities because their dangers can be managed responsibly and their benefits to individuals and society are substantial.
The primary reason to support extreme sports is that risk is not the same as recklessness. With proper training, safety regulations, and professional supervision, the likelihood of serious injury can be significantly reduced. For example, modern ski resorts enforce equipment standards and weather controls, while rafting operators require helmets, life jackets, and qualified guides. As a result, participants engage in calculated challenges rather than uncontrolled danger.
A second justification lies in the physical and psychological benefits these sports provide. Extreme activities promote fitness, resilience, and stress management, especially for people seeking alternatives to sedentary lifestyles. Moreover, they encourage personal growth by pushing individuals to overcome fear and build confidence. At a broader level, adventure tourism linked to such sports supports local economies and creates specialised employment, which would be lost under prohibition.
In conclusion, although extreme sports involve inherent risks, banning them would be an excessive response. When regulated effectively, they offer meaningful health, personal, and economic advantages. Therefore, these activities should be supported and managed, not prohibited, to allow informed adults to participate responsibly.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.