Talk about the pros/cons of this era as is full of daily invention. And discuss recent invention that you think is good or bad to society.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
This essay will discuss the pros and cons of an era that is full of daily inventions, and I argue that recent innovation shapes society in profound ways.
Firstly, this modern era of constant invention has clearly improved communication, healthcare and education across society. For instance, daily innovation has boosted efficiency and productivity, and it gives ordinary people convenience that no earlier period could offer. Moreover, this fast-moving era of discovery connects distant communities, and such connectivity strengthens social bonds within society.
However, the same period of rapid invention also brings clear drawbacks that damage society. For example, dependency on daily technology fuels addiction, isolation and a loss of privacy in this era. Furthermore, automation from recent inventions causes job displacement, and this innovation threatens the security of many workers in society.
Turning to a specific recent invention, I will focus on generative artificial intelligence, which is the defining discovery of our day. Undoubtedly, this innovation gives society access to instant knowledge, and its productivity benefits touch nearly every daily task. Nevertheless, the same recent invention spreads misinformation, and such a discovery can erode trust across society. On balance, I believe generative artificial intelligence is a good invention, because its daily benefits to society clearly outweigh the drawbacks of this era.
To conclude, the pros of a daily-invention era exceed the cons, and therefore society must guide each recent innovation with care.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.