It is argued that getting married before finishing studying or getting established in a good job is foolish. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Many people contend that marrying before completing education or becoming established in a secure career is unwise. I largely agree with this view, as early marriage often creates financial strain and restricts personal development, although some exceptions can be acknowledged.
The primary concern is economic insecurity. During study or the early stages of employment, income is typically unstable and savings are limited. Marriage introduces shared living costs and long-term responsibilities that demand financial resilience. For instance, a student combining academic work with part-time employment may struggle to meet household expenses, resulting in stress or debt, which can undermine academic performance and early career progress.
Another important issue relates to maturity and opportunity costs. Early adulthood is a critical period for gaining qualifications, exploring career options, and building independence. Marriage can reduce flexibility, particularly when relocation or further training is required. Although some argue that spousal support encourages achievement, such benefits often fail to offset constrained choices when neither partner is well established, and unmet ambitions may later harm relationship satisfaction.
In conclusion, marrying before finishing education or securing a solid job is generally imprudent because it heightens financial risk and limits personal growth. While well-prepared couples may succeed, postponing marriage until greater stability is achieved is, in most cases, the wiser course.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.