Any new technological development in recent years is a boosting or drag for the society in general. Do you agree or disagree that Mass Media, Like TV, Radio and Newspaper have a huge impact on people, especially the young generation? What is your opinion? Provide reason and examples from your own experience or observations.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Recent technological change has transformed how information circulates, making mass media a central social force. I agree that television, radio, and newspapers exert a huge influence on people, particularly the young generation, and overall this impact is more boosting than dragging because such media shapes knowledge, attitudes, and aspirations across society at scale.
First, mass media boosts learning and civic awareness by providing accessible explanations of complex issues. News programmes and educational broadcasts on television and radio expose students to public debates, science, and culture beyond the classroom. From observation, exam-focused youngsters who regularly follow quality newspapers and news channels develop broader vocabulary and sharper critical thinking, which clearly supports the young generation and informed participation in the community.
Admittedly, critics argue that constant media exposure can mislead or distract the young generation through sensationalism and advertising pressure. However, this risk reflects media literacy rather than the medium itself. When schools and families encourage evaluation of sources, even television and newspapers become tools for discernment. For instance, comparing reports across several media outlets teaches young people bias detection and responsible consumption of technology.
Overall, mass media has a huge impact on society and especially on the young generation, yet its net effect is positive when guided well. By expanding public knowledge and civic engagement while demanding critical judgement, traditional media and modern technology together remain a boosting force for society rather than a drag on progress.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.