It is important for children to take extra classes or play after school? Discuss both and give your opinions.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Whether children should take extra academic classes or play after school is widely debated among parents and teachers. In particular, extra classes can strengthen skills, while play supports the holistic development that children need after school. On the whole, in my opinion, regular play should be prioritised, because it builds social, physical, and emotional capacities.
Moreover, supporters of extra classes emphasise better academic performance and discipline through structured tuition. For instance, a remedial mathematics class may help struggling children gain confidence and keep pace at school while reducing long-term stress. Furthermore, this structured learning can close gaps and build study habits, which is a genuine benefit for many students.
However, frequent after-school classes limit the time for play that is essential for the healthy development of children. Indeed, through games and sport, children learn collaboration and emotional control while maintaining physical fitness and wellbeing. Admittedly, a child who plays football or invents games practises resilience and social interaction that transfer to classroom learning. Consequently, in my view, extra classes should be used sparingly, whereas daily play after school deserves clear priority.
In conclusion, academic tuition is effective when specific needs exist, but excessive scheduling undermines the balance children require. Ultimately, ensuring children have time to play after school fosters motivated learners and supports both academic success and lifelong health.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.