Nowadays in some schools, textbooks have been replaced by notebook computers. Are you supportive to this phenomenon? Give your reasons and support with your own experience.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
In many contemporary schools, traditional textbooks are increasingly being replaced by notebook computers as the primary learning resource. I support this development because, when managed effectively, digital technology broadens access to information and improves learning efficiency. While concerns about distraction are understandable, the educational advantages are more compelling when clear rules and teaching strategies are in place.
One major benefit of notebook computers is the flexibility and relevance of digital learning materials. Unlike printed textbooks, online content can be updated rapidly and enriched with videos, simulations, and interactive activities. From my own experience as a student, storing notes, readings, and recorded lectures on a computer made revision more organised and convenient. I could review difficult concepts repeatedly at my own pace, which strengthened understanding and reduced dependence on rote learning.
Another strong reason to support this shift is that computers help students acquire essential digital skills required in modern education and employment. Frequent use of technology promotes effective online research, collaborative writing, and clear digital communication. Critics often claim that screens weaken concentration; however, well-structured lessons, supervised use, and appropriate educational software can limit distractions and preserve academic focus.
In conclusion, replacing textbooks with notebook computers is a positive trend when implemented responsibly. Wider learning resources, improved study organisation, and stronger digital competence make this transition worthwhile. Based on my experience, technology-supported classrooms better prepare students for contemporary academic demands and future professional environments.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.