Global problems are related to governments and international organizations. What are the problems and what is your solution?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Many contemporary global challenges are closely linked to the actions and limitations of governments and international organisations. Issues such as climate change, pandemics and forced migration cross borders, yet political responses remain fragmented. I argue that weak collaboration and short-term national interests are the central problems, and that stronger multilateral governance and accountability offer the most effective solutions.
One major problem is that national governments prioritise domestic agendas over global responsibility. This leads to delayed action on emissions, unequal vaccine distribution and inconsistent humanitarian policies. International organisations often lack enforcement power, relying on voluntary compliance that powerful states can ignore. As a result, global problems escalate while trust in collective institutions erodes.
To address these challenges, governments must commit to binding international agreements with clear monitoring mechanisms. Strengthening organisations through stable funding and legal authority would improve collaboration and compliance. For example, shared climate targets enforced through trade incentives could align national interests with global goals. Additionally, transparent decision-making and fair representation would enhance legitimacy and collaboration among member states.
In conclusion, global problems persist not because solutions are unknown, but because governance remains divided and weak. By reducing short-term nationalism and empowering international organisations, collective action can become more effective. Such reforms would enable governments to manage shared risks responsibly and deliver sustainable outcomes for the global community.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.