An increasing number of athletes have been found using performance-enhancing drugs. What can be done to address the problem?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
The growing number of athletes using performance-enhancing drugs threatens fair competition and public trust in sport. This problem is driven by intense commercial pressure, weak oversight, and the limited ethical education that athletes receive. However, the problem of performance-enhancing drugs can be resolved through stronger control, improved testing, and long-term cultural change within sport.
First, the anti-doping rules that control athletes must be more rigorous and consistent across sports and countries. Random testing, biological passports, and longer bans increase the likelihood that athletes using drugs will be caught. Consequently, when detection is frequent and penalties are meaningful, the risk calculation changes for the athletes and coaches involved in competition. For example, sports that apply year-round testing report greater deterrence, because athletes cannot easily plan their drug use around competitions.
However, this control alone is insufficient to resolve the problem without prevention. Education programmes for athletes should begin early and focus on the health risks and ethical responsibility that performance drugs ignore. Moreover, many athletes turn to banned drugs because of the fear of failure and the short professional lifespans that sport imposes. Therefore, providing medical support and post-career pathways reduces the dependence of athletes on artificial enhancement and encourages clean performance.
In conclusion, the misuse of performance-enhancing drugs by athletes requires both control and prevention to resolve. Strong testing and sanctions discourage drugs, while education and athlete support address the deeper problem. Together, these measures protect the athletes, the health of sport, and the credibility of every competition.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.