Technology has made the world a better place to live. To what extent do you agree with this statement？
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Advances in digital and scientific technology have transformed the ways people work, learn, and communicate across borders. Although innovation introduces new risks, I largely agree that technology has made the world a better place to live, because its contributions to health, opportunity, and global connection outweigh the accompanying social challenges.
The most compelling benefit is the steady improvement in living standards driven by technological progress. Medical innovation allows earlier diagnosis, more precise treatment, and effective long-term disease management, which together enhance both life expectancy and quality of life. Furthermore, digital tools broaden access to education and employment, enabling individuals in remote regions to acquire skills, deliver services, and participate more fully in the global economy.
Opponents argue that technology intensifies inequality, threatens personal privacy, and weakens authentic human interaction. These concerns are valid, as automation can disrupt labour markets and online platforms may accelerate the spread of misinformation. Nevertheless, such problems largely arise from inadequate regulation and insufficient digital literacy rather than technology itself. With clearer governance frameworks, ethical system design, and responsible use, societies can reduce these risks without abandoning innovation.
In conclusion, despite undeniable drawbacks, technology has significantly improved human wellbeing. By strengthening healthcare systems, expanding access to knowledge, and connecting communities more efficiently, it creates opportunities that were previously unattainable. For these reasons, agreement with the statement is justified, provided that technological development is guided by inclusive and responsible policies.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.