Food has become easier to prepare in the modern society. This change also improves the way people live. Do you agree with that?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Advances in food technology and retail have made meals far easier to prepare than in earlier decades, through pre-cut ingredients, labour-saving appliances, and ready-to-cook products. I agree that this transformation has improved the way people live overall, because it saves time and enables healthier eating within modern lifestyles.
First, simplified food preparation releases substantial time and mental energy, which enhances daily wellbeing. When households rely on efficient appliances and partially prepared foods, routine cooking no longer dominates evenings. Consequently, individuals can devote more attention to rest, family interaction, or physical activity, reducing stress and supporting healthier work-life balance, especially for urban employees and dual-income families.
Second, easier preparation can improve diet quality rather than undermine it, despite common criticism. Modern supermarkets provide washed vegetables, portioned proteins, and clear nutritional labelling, allowing balanced meals even for people with limited cooking skills. Although convenience foods are often linked to poor habits, informed choices still permit variety and control, strengthening overall living standards.
In conclusion, the growing ease of preparing food has had a positive influence on everyday life. By conserving time and enabling practical, nutritious meals within demanding schedules, it aligns domestic routines with contemporary social and economic realities. This change should therefore be regarded as a genuine improvement in how people live.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.