Some people think the law changes our behaviour. Do you agree or disagree?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Many people argue that our behaviour is shaped mainly by culture or personal values rather than by formal law. However, I agree that law significantly changes behaviour, because clear rules set firm boundaries and strong incentives for every individual. Through its sanctions and rights, the legal system guides the daily behaviour of people in areas such as driving, work, and spending, and this makes obeying the law a rational habit.
Firstly, the strongest reason that law changes behaviour is deterrence. When the penalties within a rule are predictable and enforced, people adjust their behaviour to avoid loss, and each individual weighs that risk. For instance, speed limits set by law reduce dangerous driving, because the fines and licence points impose real costs on people. Therefore, repeated compliance with the rule becomes routine, which shows that law restrains extreme behaviour and normalises safer conduct across whole populations.
Secondly, some people claim that laws merely reflect existing morals and so cannot change behaviour. However, this view is limited, because new regulations often arrive before social acceptance and then reshape the behaviour of people. Indeed, when a law banned smoking in public places, many individuals resisted at first, yet firm regulation reshaped norms and changed everyday behaviour.
In conclusion, although values matter, law remains a powerful driver of behaviour for people and for each individual. By combining deterrence with new rules, legal regulation influences the everyday choices and long-term habits of people, and thus effective law does more than punish, since it actively steers behaviour towards safer patterns.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.