Do you agree that the rise of artificial intelligence raises ethical concerns?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
The rapid rise of artificial intelligence is reshaping decision-making across workplaces, public services, and private life. I strongly agree that this growth in AI raises serious ethical concerns, because such technology increasingly influences human welfare without sufficient transparency or accountability. Moreover, these ethical concerns are not hypothetical but embedded in the way we already deploy artificial intelligence today.
First, algorithmic bias presents a major ethical issue, since AI learns from historical data that often reflects social inequality. When we use these intelligent systems in recruitment or credit assessment, biassed patterns can unfairly exclude certain groups, and this outcome raises real concern. Such artificial intelligence undermines fairness and erodes our trust in technology, especially when its decisions are difficult to challenge or explain.
Another ethical concern involves privacy and autonomy, because AI relies on vast quantities of personal data. Continuous collection enables surveillance that individuals rarely understand, and this concern about consent is central to the debate over intelligent technology. Although AI can improve efficiency, this benefit does not justify weakening the rights and human oversight that responsible technology demands.
In conclusion, the rise of artificial intelligence undeniably generates ethical challenges related to bias, privacy, and accountability. Agreeing with this view does not mean rejecting AI, but rather demanding that we build such technology with responsible design and firm regulation. Therefore, addressing these concerns early is essential if we want artificial intelligence to serve society in a just and transparent manner, and this ethical vigilance must shape how the technology matures.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.