The invention of the Internet has had mostly negative effects on civilisation. How far do you agree with this statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
The claim that the internet has mostly negative effects on civilisation deserves careful scrutiny. In my opinion, this invention has produced a largely positive impact on modern society rather than a harmful one. Indeed, the internet has transformed communication, education, and commerce across almost every civilisation on earth.
Moreover, the greatest benefit of this technology is the rapid access to information that the web now provides. For example, a student in a remote village can use the internet to reach knowledge that earlier generations of society could never obtain. Consequently, this network of information has widened opportunity and reduced the inequality that once limited many people within society. Furthermore, the internet strengthens communication by connecting families, colleagues, and communities across every distant civilisation. Clearly, instant messaging and video calls prove that this technology sustains relationships that physical distance would otherwise weaken.
Admittedly, critics argue that the internet spreads misinformation and that excessive screen time harms the wellbeing of society. However, these negative effects reflect human misuse rather than a genuine flaw in the invention or the underlying network itself. In addition, responsible regulation and digital education can reduce the harmful impact while preserving the clear benefits of the web.
Therefore, the positive impact of the internet on society far outweighs the limited harm that this technology occasionally causes. Ultimately, the internet remains a defining invention whose overall effects on civilisation are constructive rather than destructive.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.