In contemporary societies, success is frequently equated with financial wealth, as income and assets are visible and easily compared. I partly agree with this view because economic security enables opportunity and independence. However, defining success solely through wealth is narrow and ignores other outcomes that sustain individuals and communities.

Firstly, wealth remains an important measure because it reflects productivity, skills, and contribution to the economy. Higher earnings often result from education, innovation, or entrepreneurial risk, which society values and rewards. For example, financial stability allows people to invest in health, housing, and lifelong learning, reinforcing long-term capability.

Nevertheless, many forms of success cannot be reduced to income alone and are equally significant. Social contribution, such as meaningful work, ethical behaviour, or public service, strengthens social cohesion even when it is modestly paid. Similarly, personal fulfilment, mental wellbeing, and balanced relationships indicate a successful life, as seen when individuals prioritise purpose and resilience over high salaries.

In conclusion, while wealth is a practical and influential indicator of success, it should not dominate society's judgement. A broader definition that values contribution, wellbeing, and personal growth offers a more accurate assessment of achievement. Such an approach encourages sustainable success that benefits both individuals and society as a whole.