Any new technological development in recent years is a boon or curse for society in general. Discuss.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Recent technological developments have transformed how societies function, raising debate about whether they are broadly beneficial or harmful. While critics highlight social and ethical risks, I argue that new technologies are largely a boon for society overall, provided they are managed responsibly and inclusively.
The strongest benefit lies in improved efficiency and access across key sectors. Digital tools have accelerated communication, increased productivity, and expanded access to education and healthcare. For example, online learning platforms allow people in remote areas to acquire skills that were previously unavailable, directly supporting social mobility and economic participation. Such gains enhance collective wellbeing rather than serve narrow interests, and they also strengthen long-term economic resilience.
Nevertheless, concerns about technology as a curse cannot be dismissed. Automation can displace certain jobs, and excessive reliance on digital devices may weaken social interaction or threaten privacy. However, these problems stem less from technology itself than from weak regulation and limited adaptation. When governments invest in workforce retraining programmes and enforce robust data protection, technological progress can be aligned with social stability rather than undermining it.
In conclusion, recent technological developments are predominantly a boon for society, despite genuine risks. Their capacity to expand opportunity, efficiency, and connectivity outweighs the associated drawbacks. The critical task is not to resist innovation, but to guide it through thoughtful policies and ethical use so that benefits are shared widely and sustainably.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.