Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Whether senior management should rely solely on formal authority or consider employee ideas is a significant organisational issue. I strongly agree that top-level authorities should consider staff suggestions when making decisions, while retaining final responsibility. A consultative approach improves decision quality and helps organisations respond effectively to complex and changing conditions.
The strongest argument for incorporating employee input is their direct operational experience. Employees work closely with customers, technologies, and internal processes, enabling them to identify inefficiencies and emerging problems earlier than executives. For instance, frontline staff may observe recurring service failures or safety risks before they escalate. Using such insights leads to more practical decisions that are realistic and easier to implement across the organisation.
Critics claim that seeking employee views can delay decisions and weaken managerial authority. These problems usually occur only when consultation lacks structure. Practically, formal channels such as suggestion systems or representative committees allow leaders to evaluate ideas efficiently without losing control. Moreover, participation builds motivation and trust, since employees are more likely to support decisions they have helped to shape.
To conclude, although senior managers must make the final decisions, disregarding employee ideas is ineffective. Considering workforce suggestions improves information quality, strengthens commitment, and enhances execution. Therefore, organisations that systematically listen to employees are better equipped to make sound and sustainable decisions.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.