In the past, many people having skills such as making own clothes and doing repairs to things in the house. In many countries, nowadays, skills like these are disappearing. Why do you think this change is happening? How far is this situation true in your country?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
In earlier decades, practical household skills such as sewing clothes and fixing broken items at home were widely shared across many countries. Today, these abilities are disappearing in many societies, largely because economic structures and busy lifestyles have changed how people spend their time.
Firstly, mass production and cheap clothes reduce the incentive to repair or make things at home, so time-consuming skills increasingly appear inefficient to people. Moreover, longer working hours and crowded urban living limit the chances people have to practise such handiwork, while schools now prioritise academic and digital learning over manual repairs and sewing. Consequently, this change is driven mainly by consumer convenience and shifting education priorities, and it is clearly evident, though not absolute, in my country.
In my country, this trend towards disappearing household skills is largely true, especially among younger urban people. Furthermore, few residents sew or mend clothes routinely, and professional repair services are often preferred to doing house repairs oneself. However, the situation is not universal, because older generations and rural communities still retain practical know-how, and recent interest in sustainability has revived basic repair and sewing workshops. Admittedly, this reflects the enhancement of physical and mental growth that such abilities once gave people, alongside the saving of money and the development of patience.
Therefore, the gradual disappearance of traditional household skills reflects convenience-driven consumption and changing social priorities in many countries. Ultimately, encouraging practical education and valuing repair, sewing, and handiwork alongside consumption could help these people preserve such skills without rejecting modern efficiency at home.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.