Nowadays, many people use devices, such as tablets or mobile phones, that are linked to the Internet and involve looking at screens for long periods of time. Should we be worried that this type of technology is limiting creativity?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Internet-connected devices dominate communication, work and leisure, raising concerns about their influence on creativity. While prolonged screen use can alter the way people think and produce ideas, it does not automatically suppress imagination. Creativity is limited mainly when technology encourages passive consumption rather than purposeful creation.
The principal danger lies in overreliance on ready-made digital content. Continuous scrolling, algorithm-driven recommendations and rapid information exposure can undermine reflection, experimentation and productive boredom, which are vital for original thinking. For example, people who spend hours watching short online videos often replicate popular formats instead of developing independent concepts, leading to imitation rather than innovation.
However, interactive digital technologies can also expand creative potential when applied deliberately. Mobile devices enable users to design visuals, compose music and solve complex problems, while facilitating collaboration beyond physical boundaries. A student who uses a tablet to prototype ideas or integrate multiple media is actively stimulating imagination and refining skills in ways that traditional tools alone may not permit.
In summary, concern about excessive and passive screen engagement is justified, but the technology itself is not inherently restrictive. Creative capacity depends chiefly on habits of use, guidance and intention, rather than on the devices involved. Therefore, individuals and educators should promote mindful digital habits that prioritise creation, critical thinking and sustained imaginative effort.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.