Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Many observers contend that living standards in major cities are declining rather than improving. Although urban centres continue to provide employment and services, daily wellbeing is increasingly eroded. In this essay, I will argue that congestion, housing pressure and environmental stress are the principal causes, and that aligned urban planning and targeted social investment clearly provide effective solutions.
First, the most significant causes stem from rapid urbanisation without adequate infrastructure. Overloaded transport networks, extended commuting times and persistent noise undermine physical and mental health. Moreover, escalating property prices push residents into cramped or distant accommodation, which weakens social cohesion. Air pollution and a shortage of green space further intensify stress, and modern technology often pushes people toward a sedentary lifestyle with poor fitness. Consequently, fast convenience food gradually replaces traditional home cooking, making urban life tiring instead of efficient.
To reverse this decline, authorities must therefore prioritise sustainable city management. Investment in public transport, mixed-use development and affordable housing can ease congestion and stabilise communities. Furthermore, environmental initiatives, including tighter emission controls and the expansion of urban parks, directly enhance health and comfort. In addition, spreading employment opportunities through stronger regional development can reduce pressure on megacities and balance population growth.
In conclusion, the falling quality of life in large cities arises mainly from unmanaged growth and environmental strain. These challenges undoubtedly demand integrated planning that aligns infrastructure, housing and environmental policy. When such measures are applied consistently, large cities can indeed remain productive while becoming healthier and more liveable.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.