Genetically modified foods are becoming very widespread these days. While many believe they can help feed the world’s growing population; others are sceptical of their benefits. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Genetically modified foods are becoming very widespread these days, and many people believe such foods can help feed the world's growing population. However, others remain sceptical of the benefits that these modified crops actually deliver. In this essay I will discuss both views about genetically modified foods and give my own opinion on their real benefits for the wider world.
Supporters argue that genetically modified foods offer clear benefits for a world facing rapid population growth. For instance, modified crops can be engineered to resist drought and disease, so farmers harvest more food from the same land. Consequently, cheaper and more abundant food may reach poorer regions where the population is expanding fastest. Moreover, some genetically modified foods are enriched with vitamins, which deliver real health benefits to millions across the developing world.
Sceptics, in contrast, question whether these benefits truly outweigh the risks that modified foods bring to the world. They warn that the long-term effects of eating genetically modified foods on human health remain uncertain. Furthermore, critics fear that a handful of corporations could control the food supply of the entire world population. Admittedly, small farmers may lose their traditional crops and independence, which could harm rural communities as the population grows.
In my opinion, genetically modified foods offer benefits that the world cannot easily ignore given relentless population growth. Nevertheless, I believe governments must regulate these foods carefully and fund honest research into their health effects. Ultimately, if strong safeguards protect consumers, genetically modified foods could feed a hungry world and support its expanding population responsibly for generations to come.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.