Some ex-prisoners commit crimes after being released from the prison. What do you think is the cause? How can it be solved?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Reoffending after release remains a persistent social problem that undermines public safety and wastes human potential. In my view, the main causes lie in poor reintegration into society and the lasting effects of imprisonment on behaviour. Unless these structural weaknesses are addressed, many former inmates predictably return to crime.
One major cause is the lack of employment, housing, and social support available to ex-prisoners. A criminal record restricts access to legitimate work, while weak family ties and stigma intensify isolation and financial pressure. For example, a released offender without skills or accommodation may rely on illegal activities simply to survive, making reoffending a rational response rather than a moral failure.
To reduce repeat offending, solutions must focus on effective rehabilitation before and after release. Prisons should prioritise education, vocational training, and psychological counselling to address skills deficits and antisocial patterns. After release, aligned support such as job placement, transitional housing, and mentoring can stabilise lives and reduce temptation, as steady income and social belonging discourage criminal behaviour.
Overall, reoffending is driven less by individual choice than by exclusion and unaddressed damage from incarceration. By strengthening rehabilitation and reintegration systems, governments can break the cycle between prison and crime. Such reforms protect communities while enabling former prisoners to rebuild lawful and productive lives.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.