Young people's reading and writing skills can be influenced by the increasing use of computers and mobiles. Do you agree with it? Why?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
The rapid spread of computers and mobile devices has significantly reshaped how young people engage with language. I agree that this increasing use strongly influences their reading and writing skills. While digital tools offer new opportunities for literacy development, they also introduce patterns that can weaken traditional language competence if not managed carefully.
On the positive side, technology expands access to written content and encourages frequent interaction with text. Young people read messages, articles, and online resources daily, which can increase exposure to vocabulary and ideas. For instance, educational platforms and e-books allow learners to practise reading independently and at their own pace. Regular typing can also improve spelling awareness and speed, which are useful academic skills.
However, the influence is not entirely beneficial. Informal digital communication often promotes shortened words, emojis, and minimal grammar, which can transfer into academic writing. Constant multitasking on mobile devices may also reduce attention span, making it harder for students to read long texts critically. As a result, depth of comprehension and structured writing can decline despite high levels of screen-based activity.
In conclusion, computers and mobiles undeniably affect young people's reading and writing skills. Although they provide valuable resources and practice opportunities, their unregulated use can undermine accuracy and critical literacy. Therefore, guidance from educators and parents is essential to ensure technology supports, rather than replaces, strong language foundations.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.