Nowadays modern gadgets are widely used by young people and the use of these products reduces their creativity. Do you agree or disagree?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
The widespread adoption of modern gadgets by young people has generated anxiety that intensive digital use diminishes creativity. I disagree with this claim, because creative capacity is shaped by patterns of engagement rather than by tools themselves, and contemporary devices often encourage imaginative exploration and original output.
One strong reason is that digital gadgets greatly expand access to creative resources and lower barriers to experimentation. Young people can compose music, design graphics, write code, or edit videos through accessible applications, receiving immediate feedback that supports revision. For instance, a teenager using a tablet can sketch, modify, and share ideas repeatedly, a cycle that develops flexible thinking and inventive outcomes.
Critics argue that heavy screen use promotes passivity, which can restrict creative growth; however, this reflects habits rather than technology. With guidance and self-regulation, digital tools foster collaboration, analytical thinking, and the blending of ideas across cultures. Participation in online communities exposes youths to diverse viewpoints, which frequently spark novel connections and solutions that are difficult to achieve in isolation.
In summary, the assertion that modern gadgets reduce the creativity of young people is unpersuasive. Although unbalanced consumption may be harmful, intentional and creative use of digital devices broadens skills, supports experimentation, and strengthens originality. Modern gadgets should therefore be regarded as enablers of creativity when integrated thoughtfully into young lives.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.