Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Advertising is a powerful feature of modern consumer economies, shaping awareness and preferences. Critics argue that it stimulates unnecessary consumption, while supporters contend it informs people about innovations that enhance daily life. This essay discusses both perspectives and argues that, although advertising can promote wasteful buying, its informational role is more beneficial when consumers remain critical.
Those who oppose advertising emphasise its persuasive techniques, which often exploit emotions rather than needs. Constant exposure to targeted messages can normalise impulsive purchasing and create artificial desires, particularly for branded fashion or upgraded electronics. As a result, households may overspend, accumulate debt, and contribute to environmental damage through excessive production and waste.
Conversely, advertisements also function as a source of information in complex markets. They introduce new products, compare features, and signal availability, which can save time and improve decision-making, especially for health, education, or energy-saving technologies. When regulations restrict false claims and consumers evaluate messages sceptically, advertising supports competition and encourages firms to improve quality and price.
In my view, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks because informed choice is essential in modern life. While advertising can encourage unnecessary purchases, its harms are mitigated by media literacy and oversight. Overall, responsible advertising, combined with critical consumers, enhances awareness and innovation rather than merely promoting excess.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.