Your school has enough money to buy either books for its library or computer for its students. What do you think schools should do for the best of students?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
When a school has enough money to buy either books for its library or computers for its students, it must decide which resource best serves education, and I believe schools should invest that money in computers.
Firstly, computers give students immediate access to a vast range of up-to-date resources, including e-books, journals, and educational platforms that a printed library cannot match. Moreover, unlike static textbooks, digital resources on computers can be updated quickly and shared by many pupils at once, which stretches limited school funds efficiently. For example, a single computer suite lets students carry out research, data analysis, and coding, preparing these pupils for higher education and the modern labour market. In addition, technology on computers builds essential digital literacy, a skill that traditional books and a paper library rarely develop for students.
Admittedly, physical books encourage deep reading and reduce screen fatigue, so a well-stocked school library still holds genuine academic value for pupils. However, when funds are limited, a library of printed textbooks can become outdated and unevenly used, whereas computers keep the education of students current. Furthermore, computers can still support reading through digital books while also offering multimedia lessons and accessibility tools for students with disabilities. Therefore, the flexible reach of technology means computers serve more subjects than a fixed collection of library books can for the same money. Consequently, investing scarce school funds in computers rather than more textbooks maximises learning outcomes across the curriculum for every student.
In conclusion, although books remain valuable, schools facing tight budgets should choose computers, because this resource expands educational access and equips students with the skills a modern library alone cannot provide.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.