“Success is only due to hard work. Luck does not make a person successful or unsuccessful.” Do you agree or disagree with that opinion? Use specific examples and reasons to explain your answer.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Many people argue that success results purely from hard work, dismissing luck as a decisive factor. In my opinion, I largely disagree with this specific view about success. Although hard work is essential for genuine achievement, luck significantly shapes career opportunities and personal outcomes. This essay presents reasons and examples showing that success emerges from both effort and favourable external circumstances.
Firstly, luck grants access to opportunities that hard work alone cannot create for any person. For example, talented graduates who work hard still depend on meeting supportive mentors, and such fortune amplifies their effort into visible achievement. Furthermore, external factors like environment, education, resources, and network shape whether personal effort truly leads to success.
Admittedly, hard work builds skill, talent, determination, perseverance, and motivation that raise the probability of career success. However, ignoring luck overlooks how uncontrollable circumstances and chance shape a person's ultimate achievement. For instance, athletes who work extremely hard face injuries and judging decisions that determine whether their effort yields success or failure. Consequently, this debate about hard work and luck reveals that success also depends on timing and privilege. Moreover, overcoming challenges and turning failure into learning and growth requires favourable luck alongside sustained effort. Therefore, a healthy attitude, self-belief, and confidence prepare a person to seize a lucky opportunity when it arises.
In conclusion, hard work forms the foundation of success, yet luck converts genuine effort into real achievement and career goal. Ultimately, twenty-first century stakeholders should recognise that both hard work and luck jointly make a person successful.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.