Does the advent of Internet change the role of teacher? To what extent do you agree?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
The rapid expansion of the Internet has transformed access to information and reshaped educational environments worldwide. I strongly agree that this development has changed the role of the teacher to a large extent, although it has not reduced the importance of educators. Instead, teaching responsibilities have shifted from direct knowledge transmission to the facilitation of effective learning.
The most significant change is that teachers are no longer the sole or primary source of information. Students can independently access online lectures, digital libraries and interactive platforms at any time. Consequently, teachers increasingly function as guides who help learners evaluate information, develop critical thinking skills and apply knowledge appropriately. For instance, during research-based assignments, teachers now prioritise training students to judge the credibility of online sources rather than merely supplying factual content, which enhances academic reasoning.
However, some argue that the Internet weakens teachers' influence by encouraging self-directed learning. While this argument has some validity, it underestimates the growing need for professional guidance. Without structured support, students may feel overwhelmed by excessive information or misled by inaccurate material. Teachers therefore remain essential in organising learning tasks, sustaining motivation and promoting meaningful collaboration, particularly within blended or fully online classrooms.
In conclusion, the Internet has clearly reshaped the role of the teacher, moving it from instructor to facilitator and mentor. Although technology broadens educational opportunities, effective learning still relies on teachers who can guide, provide context and inspire students in an increasingly digital age.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.