Do you think schools should have a curriculum asking students to play old dramas and works of theatres written centuries ago? Discuss and use your own experience as examples.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Whether schools should include old dramas and theatrical works written centuries ago in the curriculum remains a subject of genuine debate among educators. Although some consider these plays obsolete, I firmly argue that they deserve a prominent place in education because they foster cultural understanding and sharpen analytical ability when taught with a clear learning purpose.
Firstly, studying old plays introduces students to powerful ideas, narrative forms, and ethical questions that continue to shape modern society. Themes of power, justice, and ambition in classical theatre works remain recognisable across curricula despite historical language and distance. Specifically, from my own school experience, performing scenes from a drama strengthened my character analysis and interpretation of subtext, which later supported academic writing and discussion in literature classes.
Furthermore, theatre works also build communication and performance skills that standard curriculum subjects rarely address. Standing before an audience and delivering lines from centuries-old dramas develops student confidence, voice projection, and shared teamwork. In particular, schools that integrate theatrical performance report stronger student engagement with literature and history overall.
Admittedly, opponents argue that such works discourage learners due to archaic vocabulary and distant contexts. This criticism has merit. Yet when schools promote plays through guided discussion and contemporary comparisons, student engagement with classic dramas improves considerably. Consequently, connecting classical theatre works to current social issues makes challenging scripts accessible and meaningful.
In conclusion, schools should retain centuries-old dramas and plays in the curriculum because they build lasting cultural knowledge and critical skills. These theatrical works can educate, challenge, and inspire students, proving that classics still hold strong relevance in modern education.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.