It is getting harder for children to live and grow in the 21st century than in the past. Do you agree or disagree?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Compared with earlier generations, many children today grow up in a more demanding environment shaped by rapid technological change and heightened social expectations. I agree that living and developing in the 21st century is harder overall, because risks to wellbeing have increased while traditional sources of protection have weakened.
A central challenge is the digital landscape, which exposes children to constant comparison, cyberbullying, and excessive screen use. Unlike earlier, limited media, social platforms penetrate the home and daily routine, disturbing sleep, concentration, and self-esteem. Online harassment can spread instantly and remain visible for years, generating stress that schools and families find difficult to contain, thereby harming emotional resilience during crucial stages of development.
Another difficulty arises from intensified academic competition and economic pressure on families. Education systems increasingly emphasise early achievement and continual testing, while insecure employment and rising living costs reduce parental time and stability. Although modern healthcare and access to information are clear benefits, they do not offset anxiety caused by examinations, reduced unstructured play, and uncertainty about future prospects.
In conclusion, despite undeniable technological and medical progress, contemporary childhood often involves heavier psychological and social burdens than before. Digital risks and intensified academic and economic pressures complicate healthy development. It is therefore reasonable to argue that, for many children, growing up in the 21st century is more difficult than it was in the past.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.