Lots of scientists agree that human activities have increased global temperatures. Do you agree? Give solutions for reducing global warming.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Many scientists contend that rising global temperatures are largely driven by human activity rather than natural cycles. In particular, I strongly agree with this view, because the scale and speed of recent warming match industrial patterns of energy use. On the whole, addressing global warming therefore requires direct changes to how human societies produce and consume resources.
Moreover, the strongest evidence of human responsibility lies in greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and deforestation. For instance, burning coal, oil, and gas releases carbon dioxide faster than ecosystems can absorb it, accelerating global warming. Furthermore, forest loss removes natural carbon sinks, so heat is trapped in the atmosphere and climate change intensifies across regions. Indeed, these human activities form the clearest driver of rising temperature that scientists have consistently documented.
Consequently, in the same way, to reduce global warming an effective solution is to prioritise renewable energy and greater efficiency. In addition, expanding solar and wind power cuts emissions without limiting the economic activity on which people depend. Admittedly, in fact, protecting forests and sustainable agriculture can restore carbon absorption and reduce further damage to the environment.
In conclusion, human activity is a primary cause of increasing global temperature, supported by clear scientific evidence. Ultimately, through aligned policy, cleaner technology, and behavioural change, this global warming can be mitigated in a realistic and sustainable way.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.