City’s population has been growing rapidly. To cope with this problem, should we rely on city planners or new policies?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Rapid growth in the urban population places severe strain on housing, transport, and services, forcing every city to choose an effective response. In particular, while a city planner plays a valuable role, the main reliance should rest on new and coherent policy. On the whole, in my opinion, a strong policy sets the priorities that planning expertise alone cannot deliver during rapid urban growth.
Moreover, well-designed policy confronts the root causes of urban pressure by guiding land use and infrastructure funding across the city. For instance, zoning reform and better transportation near high-density housing reduce congestion while protecting accessibility for the growing population. Furthermore, because policy applies across the whole city, it provides the consistency and long-term direction that piecemeal planning cannot achieve.
Indeed, a city planner nevertheless remains essential in translating urban policy into feasible and context-sensitive development. Admittedly, the technical knowledge and spatial analysis of a planner ensure that regulation matches local conditions and real growth. However, if housing or transport policy is outdated, the planner is limited in what urban strategy they can actually deliver. Consequently, a strong policy gives the city planner the authority to organise management and anticipate expansion instead of reacting to every problem.
In conclusion, a city facing rapid population growth should primarily depend on new policy, with the planner implementing it effectively. Ultimately, policy leadership delivers scale and coherence, so prioritising policy reform lets urban growth be managed as a deliberate strategy.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.