In globalisation, it is impossible to succeed if you cannot speak at least one foreign language. Do you think everyone must learn at least one foreign language?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
In an increasingly globalised world, economic and social success is often linked to cross-border communication. In particular, while technology reduces some barriers, I largely agree that learning at least one foreign language is necessary for most people. On the whole, in my opinion, this foreign language requirement is a broad skill expectation rather than an absolute rule.
Moreover, foreign language proficiency expands professional and educational opportunity in a global labour market shaped by globalisation. For instance, employers value workers who can negotiate and build trust across cultures through confident communication and understanding. Furthermore, a manager who speaks another language can handle international clients directly, improving efficiency through smoother interaction. Indeed, this direct communication strengthens both individual careers and the competitiveness of any organisation operating across borders.
Admittedly, some argue that global languages and translation tools make foreign language learning unnecessary in a globalised world. However, these tools cannot fully convey cultural nuance or establish the genuine relations that real understanding requires. Consequently, in diplomacy and service industries, even basic foreign language skills signal respect and support long-term success.
In conclusion, although not everyone requires fluency, learning at least one foreign language is increasingly essential in a globalised society. Ultimately, it enhances communication, employability, and multilingualism, so most people should develop this language skill to succeed in an interconnected world.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.