Since the beginning of the 20th century, the number of endangered species has increased significantly and we have witnessed more mass extinctions in this period than in any other period of time. State some reasons for this and provide possible solutions.
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
Since the beginning of the twentieth century, biodiversity loss has accelerated, and unprecedented numbers of species now face extinction. In particular, this pattern of endangered wildlife is largely the result of human behaviour rather than natural evolutionary cycles over this period. On the whole, the main reason is that habitat destruction and pollution disrupt ecosystems faster than nature can recover.
Moreover, a principal reason is extensive habitat loss driven by urbanisation, industrial agriculture, and large infrastructure projects. For instance, forest clearing and wetland drainage fragment the natural habitat, isolating animal populations and reducing genetic diversity. Furthermore, excessive hunting, overfishing, and the wildlife trade directly remove species from nature, accelerating extinction across many regions. Indeed, chemical contamination and rising temperatures further undermine the fragile habitat on which endangered species depend for survival.
Consequently, an effective solution requires long-term conservation, so governments should strengthen land-use regulation and expand protected areas for wildlife. In addition, by practising sustainable farming and fishing, societies can reduce ecological damage while still meeting human needs. Admittedly, stricter enforcement against illegal wildlife trade and lower emissions would ease pressure on many vulnerable species and their habitats.
In conclusion, the sharp rise in endangered species since 1900 is primarily driven by human exploitation of nature over this period. Ultimately, without decisive conservation and protection, further extinction is likely, so responsible resource management offers the best solution for global biodiversity.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.