Children should learn good handwriting, or typing at school, which one is more important?
A.I. Score
Each colour is one skill. Tap a colour to hide it. Tap it again to show it.
As digital technologies increasingly shape education and work, schools must decide whether to prioritise handwriting or typing skills. While neat handwriting retains traditional value, typing is more important for children today because it supports efficient learning, modern communication, and future employability, provided that basic handwriting competence is still taught.
Typing enables children to produce and edit text rapidly, which directly improves learning outcomes across subjects. Students can draft essays, revise errors, and organise ideas without the physical constraints of slow writing. For example, typed assignments allow learners to focus on argument and structure rather than letter formation, leading to clearer thinking and higher productivity across the curriculum.
Moreover, typing is the primary mode of communication in higher education and most professions. Emails, reports, coding, and collaborative documents all require keyboard proficiency, and weak typing skills can disadvantage students despite strong ideas. Critics argue that handwriting aids memory development; however, this benefit can be achieved through targeted note-taking activities without making handwriting the central instructional focus within school curricula.
In conclusion, although children should learn legible handwriting for everyday tasks, typing deserves greater emphasis in schools. It aligns with contemporary educational practises, supports cognitive development through revision and organisation, and prepares students for a digital economy. Prioritising typing while maintaining handwriting fundamentals offers the most balanced and realistic approach.
- Fully addresses the prompt in depth, showing full command of the argument by reformulating the issue in the writer's own words and expanding important points with specificity.
- The argument is supported convincingly with subsidiary points and relevant examples throughout the response.
- Has an effective logical structure, flows smoothly, and can be followed with ease.
- The argument is clear and cohesive and developed systematically at length; a well-developed introduction and conclusion are present, and ideas are organised cohesively into clear, logically sequenced paragraphs.
- Uses a variety of connective devices effectively and consistently to convey relationships between ideas.
- A variety of expressions and vocabulary are used appropriately to formulate ideas with ease and precision throughout the response.
- No signs of limitations restricting what can be communicated.
- Errors in language use, if present, are rare and minor, and meaning is completely clear.
- Shows consistent grammatical control of complex language. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.
- Good command of a broad lexical repertoire, idiomatic expressions and collocations.
- Correct spelling.
- Length is within the required 200 to 300 words.