Globalisation intensifies cross-border exchange and raises questions about linguistic dominance. In my opinion, despite globalisation, English will remain a global language, although its role will evolve. Indeed, historical momentum, institutional embedding, and practical utility continue to favour English even as multilingualism expands through trade, migration, and digital communication.

First, English is deeply embedded in the global systems that align international business. Specifically, it dominates international business, aviation, science, and education, reducing the communication barrier for organisations despite cultural diversity. For example, multinational teams rely on English technology, documentation, and meetings to operate efficiently, reinforcing the network benefit of a shared global language. Consequently, switching to alternative international languages remains a costly challenge and unlikely at scale.

However, critics argue that globalisation and technology empower regional languages and translation, weakening English. While these forces clearly matter, they complement rather than replace a common global language. Moreover, automated translation still requires shared terminology, and regional influence often grows through English media and international education. Therefore, English remains the bridging language that links diverse linguistic communities despite cultural diversity.

Overall, globalisation does not erode English so much as reshape its function as a global language. Ultimately, this language is likely to persist as the default connector for global communication across society, alongside stronger local languages. This balanced outcome reflects efficiency and the continuing benefit of a shared international language, despite globalisation.