You are in free guest mode.
Timed Practice
Revision List
Attempt History
Progress Tracking
Create a free account to unlock these tools
Practice Writing: Summarize Written Text
ID: #567
July Prediction
Australian Indigenous Food
In its periodic quest for culinary identity, Australia automatically looks to its indigenous ingredients, the foods that are native to this country. ‘There can be little doubt that using an indigenous product must qualify a dish’ as Australian notes, Stephanie Alexander. Similarly, and without qualification, Cherikoff state that ‘A uniquely Australian food culture can only be based upon foods indigenous to this country, although, as Craw remarks, proposing Australian native foods as national symbols rely more upon their association with ‘nature’ and geographic origin than on common usage.
Notwithstanding the lack of justification for the premise that national dishes are, of necessity, founded on ingredients native to the country - after all, Italy’s gastronomic identity is tied to the non-indigenous tornado, Thailand’s to the non-indigenous chilli - the reality is that Australians do not eat indigenous foods in significant quantities. The exceptions are fish, crustaceans and shellfish from oceans, rivers and lakes, most of which are unarguably unique to this country. Despite valiant and well-intentioned efforts today at promoting and encouraging the consumption of native resources, bush foods are not harvested or produced in sufficient quantities for them to be a standard component of Australian diets, nor are they generally accessible. Indigenous foods are less relevant to Australian identity today than lamb and passionfruit, both initially imported and now naturalised.
Notwithstanding the lack of justification for the premise that national dishes are, of necessity, founded on ingredients native to the country - after all, Italy’s gastronomic identity is tied to the non-indigenous tornado, Thailand’s to the non-indigenous chilli - the reality is that Australians do not eat indigenous foods in significant quantities. The exceptions are fish, crustaceans and shellfish from oceans, rivers and lakes, most of which are unarguably unique to this country. Despite valiant and well-intentioned efforts today at promoting and encouraging the consumption of native resources, bush foods are not harvested or produced in sufficient quantities for them to be a standard component of Australian diets, nor are they generally accessible. Indigenous foods are less relevant to Australian identity today than lamb and passionfruit, both initially imported and now naturalised.
* Summarize in the box below (between 5 and 75 words)
A.I. Score
With a free account:
Retry and compare every attempt.
Sample Answer 1
In its periodic quest for culinary identity, Australia automatically looks to its indigenous ingredients, the foods that are native to this nation, and indigenous foods are less relevant to Australian identity today than lamb and passionfruit, both initially imported and now naturalised.
Sample Answer 2
With the fact that Australian indigenous foods are native to this country and rely on geographic origin in its periodic quest for culinary identity, Austrians do not eat indigenous foods insignificant quantities, because indigenous foods are not harvested or produced in sufficient quantities for them to be a standard component of Australian diets, nor are they generally accessible, which makes indigenous foods are less relevant to Australian identity today.
Explanation
In its periodic quest for culinary identity, Australia automatically looks to its indigenous ingredients, the foods that are native to this
countrynation, and indigenous foods are less relevant to Australian identity today than lamb and passionfruit, both initially imported and now naturalised. -> Both sentences talking about indigenous food
Saving...