Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Select Missing Word ID: #4244 Medium Environment
Instructions
I’m very disappointed with Love lock’s change of ideas. He was somebody who had a lot of interesting ideas about the environment, and I’m sad that he has turned his back on what he said before. There's no way nuclear power is safe. It's just as harmful to the environment as traditional fossil fuels, and as well as that, there's the enormous risk of storing nuclear waste. A brave statement from a very interesting man. Our party has always had a strong record on defending the environment, and looking at environmental problems in a constructive way. I’m glad to see that a distinguished scientist agrees with us. We want to build more nuclear power stations, and defend the environment and now we can! The problem with James Love lock is that he isn’t really a scientist. He has lots of experience in different fields, and I respect him, he’s certainly an intelligent man. But a lot of his theories have never really had that much support in the serious scientific community they’ve been picked up by lots of other people, green campaigners and such. I wouldn’t - listen to him too much.
* Click on the correct answer

Result:

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Saving...