[{"paragraphs":[{"paragraph_label":"Paragraph 1","paragraph_text":"A whistle-blower is a person who exposes any information or activity that is deemed illegal, unethical, or not correct within an organisation that is either private or public.","correct_position":1},{"paragraph_label":"Paragraph 2","paragraph_text":"The information of alleged wrongdoing can be classified in many ways: violation of company policy/rules, law, regulation, or threat to public interest/national security, as well as fraud, and corruption.","correct_position":2},{"paragraph_label":"Paragraph 3","paragraph_text":"Those who become whistle-blowers can choose to bring information or allegations to the surface either internally or externally.","correct_position":3},{"paragraph_label":"Paragraph 4","paragraph_text":"Internally, a whistle-blower can bring his/her accusations to the attention of other people within the accused organisation such as an immediate supervisor.","correct_position":4},{"paragraph_label":"Paragraph 5","paragraph_text":"Externally, a whistle-blower can bring allegations to light by contacting a third party outside of an accused organisation such as the media, government, law enforcement, or those who are concerned.","correct_position":5}],"first_sentence":{"paragraph_label":"Paragraph 1","paragraph_text":"A whistle-blower is a person who exposes any information or activity that is deemed illegal, unethical, or not correct within an organisation that is either private or public.","correct_position":1,"explanation":" Why this is the first line? This paragraph is the first sentence because it introduces the main topic of whistle-blowers. It gives a clear definition of who a whistle-blower is. This follows the rule of Topic Sentence because it sets up the main idea without going into details. Why other lines are not chosen? The other paragraphs are not chosen because they do not stand alone. For example, Paragraph 2 starts with \"The information\" which needs context. Paragraph 3 starts with \"Those who become\" which also needs more information. Paragraph 4 and 5 start with \"Internally\" and \"Externally\" which are not general statements. They refer back to the idea of whistle-blowers but do not introduce it."},"sentence_pairs":[{"pair_label":"Pair 1 (Paragraph 1 → Paragraph 2)","pair_text":"A whistle-blower is a person who exposes any information or activity that is deemed illegal, unethical, or not correct within an organisation that is either private or public. → The information of alleged wrongdoing can be classified in many ways: violation of company policy/rules, law, regulation, or threat to public interest/national security, as well as fraud, and corruption.","explanation":"Paragraph 2 connects to Paragraph 1 because it gives more details about the information that a whistle-blower might expose. This follows the Broader to Specific Strategy. The first paragraph gives a general idea of what a whistle-blower is, and the second paragraph explains the types of wrongdoing."},{"pair_label":"Pair 2 (Paragraph 2 → Paragraph 3)","pair_text":"The information of alleged wrongdoing can be classified in many ways: violation of company policy/rules, law, regulation, or threat to public interest/national security, as well as fraud, and corruption. → Those who become whistle-blowers can choose to bring information or allegations to the surface either internally or externally.","explanation":"Paragraph 3 connects to Paragraph 2 because it explains what whistle-blowers do with the information mentioned in Paragraph 2. This follows the Logical Order rule. The second paragraph talks about types of wrongdoing, and the third paragraph explains how whistle-blowers can act on that information."},{"pair_label":"Pair 3 (Paragraph 3 → Paragraph 4)","pair_text":"Those who become whistle-blowers can choose to bring information or allegations to the surface either internally or externally. → Internally, a whistle-blower can bring his/her accusations to the attention of other people within the accused organisation such as an immediate supervisor.","explanation":"Paragraph 4 connects to Paragraph 3 because it gives a specific example of how whistle-blowers can act internally. This follows the General to Specific Strategy. The third paragraph talks about the choice of internal or external reporting, and the fourth paragraph gives details about internal reporting."},{"pair_label":"Pair 4 (Paragraph 4 → Paragraph 5)","pair_text":"Internally, a whistle-blower can bring his/her accusations to the attention of other people within the accused organisation such as an immediate supervisor. → Externally, a whistle-blower can bring allegations to light by contacting a third party outside of an accused organisation such as the media, government, law enforcement, or those who are concerned.","explanation":"Paragraph 5 connects to Paragraph 4 because it gives a specific example of how whistle-blowers can act externally. This follows the Object Subject Strategy. The fourth paragraph talks about internal actions, and the fifth paragraph explains external actions."},"last_sentence":{"paragraph_label":"Paragraph 5","paragraph_text":"Externally, a whistle-blower can bring allegations to light by contacting a third party outside of an accused organisation such as the media, government, law enforcement, or those who are concerned.","correct_position":5,"explanation":" Why this is the last line? This paragraph is the last sentence because it wraps up the discussion about whistle-blowers. It gives the final example of how they can act externally. This follows the Summary Style rule because it brings together the ideas of internal and external actions of whistle-blowers."}}]
